« Do Consumers Care About Operating Systems and Applications? | Main | Nintendo Fluency »

China, India and Pragmatic Technology Design

If you were dozing off in front of the fire this holiday season, you may have missed news that Tata, India's largest industrial conglomerate, is close to closing deals to purchase Land Rover and Jaguar from Ford Motor Company. With interests ranging from tea bags to IT services, Tata's pursuit of the two companies is emblematic of its intentions not just to provide products and services to South Asia, but to the world.

Talk about luxury cars obscured reports that Tata plans to roll out an ultra-basic mass market vehicle at the opposite end of the price range (today officially dubbed the "Nano" - ed.). Like its cousin the OLPC,  the closely held vehicle concept is expected to have a price tag 1/6th of the average of its category--around $2,500 according to those in the know. And like the OLPC and the Asus Eee its currently hot ultralight laptop competitor, the ultracheap Tata car gets to that price range by ditching luxuries deemed unnecessary for the market it aims for, such as multiple windshield wipers, tachometers or sexy electronic transmissions.

The design, as described so far, throws out as much metal, technology and creature comforts as it can to create a vehicle that meets the needs of consumers in the developing world who need just a basic mode of transportation with four walls (three in the case of this car's apparent teardrop design), wheels and an engine. As an old boss of mine used to say, the goal is "fitness for purpose".  Aspiration to Tata's target markets is not aspiration as defined in the middle-class world of the West. Not everyone needs a stylish but affordable sedan, and in Tata's view, not everyone needs a smooth-shifting transmission or indication of the exact number of revs the engine is turning.

This different point of view, understanding the real, pragmatic needs and risk tolerances of consumers in developing markets is an important edge in mindset that is propelling the ascent of technology not just sold or serviced in but designed in developing countries. And some, including Changeist, believe that this deep understanding of local needs may drive companies like Tata, China's Huawei and other rising stars of technology in the East past today's Western technology giants. While Western companies unconsciously (or strategically) try to sell the Western middle class idea of comfort, access or convenience to "the other 5 billion," local designers and product makers are filling shelves and car lots with goods that better target the current desires of those billions: just to send a message, get two people from one city to the next, or create a refrigerator that will last a couple of years until the owner can afford something better.

To find out more about this topic and how Changeist can help your organization understand its impact and the opportunities it presents, contact us at + 1 919 373 4360, or at info @ changeist.com. 

Posted on Monday, January 7, 2008 at 11:14AM by Registered CommenterScott Smith in | Comments3 Comments | References1 Reference

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (1)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Response: mofle.net
    Every man prefers to have a way to the online world.

Reader Comments (3)

I would agree with Scott Smith and Changeist that it is completely new product geared specifically keeping "fitness for purpose" in mind.

As I have argued elsewhere the fact that it is the cheapest car ever made does not mean that it is either low quality or a knock-off copy of some high-quality variant. As a senior Robert Bosch executive noted, "Low-price vehicles are not vehicles of inferior quality equipped with the most basic components … [T]hey are inexpensive technical solutions produced using state-of-the-art components ." And low costs have been engineered into the car by designing the car afresh and not by using cheaper slimmed-down versions of existing components and designs. It is a globally envisaged Indian manufacturing response to Indian needs, engineered for Indian conditions and markets. Indeed, in my view, given environmental concerns and urban densities, India’s mobility requirements are perhaps best met by a combination of mass transit systems and small cars like the $2,500 one.

In case anybody is interested the url for my article on the Tata small car is
http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/jan/04tatacar.htm

Mritiunjoy Mohanty
January 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterMritiunjoy Mohanty
Both the OLPC and the Tata Nano reduced costs by leaving unnecessary things out. However the big reduction in cost came not from this, but from innovative rethinking of design from the ground up.

In the case of the OLPC it was the innovative display, the aggressive power saving scheme which works by milli-second suspend and resume, and the relaying wireless network that creates a WAN out of thin air.

In the case of the Nano, it is the use of plastics and fastening with glue, the elimination of constant velocity joints, the minimization of component count (for example by use of a two cylinder engine, single wing mirror etc.), and minimization of weight while still keeping the car spacious to allow reasonable performance while allowing a smaller engine.
January 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSPM
Changeist has touched the nerve that need for mobility and creature comforts need not get mixed always.Humans are yet to learn to look at life from 'natural' perspectives that are not complex. Nano is a small step in that direction; no different from the efforts to tap solar energy or Yoga for Health.!
January 12, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterVijay Kumar

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.